So here's the final installment folks -
Maleficent – Mark 2, 2014
Jolie is the star vehicle and she certainly has presence, a stillness
that is intense and mesmerizing. She
looks amazing – just like her earlier animated version in the flesh. However the
story-telling is confused, the film over-produced and the musical score
bombastic. If a voice-over can be heavy-‘handed’, this is it.
The script is frankly a mess. Linda Woolverton who has written such classics as The Lion King and Beauty and the Beast, as well as the
unfortunate latest version of Alice in
Wonderland, here revels in formulaic battle-scenes and psycho-babble.
It begins with Maleficent who isn’t evil
but really good. Words obviously mean the opposite of what they say. She lives
in a place named The Moors which are not windswept open and uncultivated, but
green, watery and forested, crowded with creatures who all love each other and
practice equality. The other country is seemingly open and barren, dominated by
a big castle where a king who loves battle, rules with iron and lots of chaps
in armour.
Throughout there is a tension playing
out between good and evil; the 2 countries, the 2 sexes, (the male betrays and
violates the innocent female ), and the
2 generations – the bad, mad father who
cares nothing for his daughter and the wronged, yet maternal Maleficent protecting,
despite herself, the young vulnerable girl.
We follow Maleficent’s story from carefree,
winged childhood to betrayal and hideous violation. The removal of her wings,
which gave her freedom, power and joy, is shocking, and in true fairy-tale
gruesome tradition. This is probably the most authentic moment in the film. But
there is no-one else in the story to counter-balance her power and give ballast
to her role. The real evil-doer, the King becomes a cipher of crazed paranoia.
The raven side-kick, who Maleficent tyrannizes, is just a comic-book caricature
who never has a chance to act because the special effects keep getting in the
way.
Aurora is a blonde baby doll whose
sweetness irritates. The poor girl flits aimlessly about with no parental
guidance or education from her real parents or from the surrogate selfish,
silly, fairy women. Maleficent’s guardianship takes the form of keeping her
physically safe and watching her pat tame, fanciful creatures. Even the Barbie fairy tale movies grappled
seriously with authentic activities that would help the princess’s debut into
adult life.
If one definition of maleficence can be characterized by that
horrible marketing phase – ‘It’s all
about me”- I think this is a huge unredeemable fault of the film.
This is one woman’s movie, and it is
literally all about her. The other side never has a chance against Jolie’s star
power, and the script skews it this way as well. The script gives a twist to
the famous kiss of true love which might help resolve Maleficent’s dilemma
(kind of), but leaves the pretty boy prince, solely a decorative character.
Once he’s bundled offstage by the fairy mothers, the male side of the cast has
no place to go into the future.
Because the
young man didn’t bring ‘true love’ to Aurora, then their future together becomes
very problematical. When he grows up, if he succumbs to power and greed his
behaviour could easily become a carbon copy of the older generation father. The
prince represents an ongoing threat, for he may well turn and betray Aurora as
Maleficent was herself betrayed.
Aurora is never truly woken from her
‘sleep’ of ripening through metamorphosis into sexual flowering and womanhood.
In discovering Maleficent’s wings and helping return them to their rightful
owner, she plays a service role, not that of an individuated person. She has
been reconciled with the older woman who cares for her, but an authentic
transformation into womanhood requires a separation from the mother figure and
an awakening into one’s own body.
In the older traditional narratives, a
wedding allowed for a satisfying open ending that gives the possibility of hope
between the 2 sexes, the 2 countries and the 2 generations.
Words once again belie the reality, for
despite the voiceover assuring us that tyranny is over, Maleficent is firmly in
charge of both countries, both genders, both generations.
In sole charge. Power and gender issues
are certainly not resolved. Any power remaining in the hands of one boss, does
not create equal rights for the whole community, despite all the smoke and
mirrors of CGI shape-shifting.
This Disney movie is an international
blockbuster and Angelina Jolie has a huge world-wide fan base. Many women admire
her as a movie star, as well as her leadership of social and political issues,
not to mention her personal life in the roles of mother and lover. Her movies
then, become an extension of her and her ideas, which I suspect she intends
them to be. Mostly she plays the female action heroine, a kick-ass sex object,
a strong woman albeit in conventional Hollywood terms. And this movie is no exception. Here she plays
a famous animated anti- heroine who intimates that ‘it’s ok to be all about me’.
But I think she, as well as the female
script writer Linda Woolverton, have ultimately failed in their responsibility
to the public and especially to children viewers. The movie is a muddle, but
there’s one strong theme we take away from it.
The film suggests that maleness and
femaleness are fundamentally opposed and always attempt to take power away from
each other. This is a terribly problematic proposition and certainly not a
feminist principle.
It’s a disturbing finger on the pulse
of gender politics in America today.
Sources
The Sleeping Beauty in the Wood by
Charles Perrault 1696 (from Classic Fairy Tales 1922)
Little Briar Rose in The Complete
Grimm Fairy Tales. 1944
From the Beast to the Blonde by Marina
Warner. 1994
Spinning Straw into Gold by Joan Gould
2005
Grimm Tales for Young and Old by
Philip Pullman 2012
Well put, Fern. Written with a critically intelligent eye. When I first watched this, I thought, YES women finally taking the reins in a Hollywood Blockbuster, but now I agree with you. Why does it have to be men against women, women against men - that's not how equality looks :)
ReplyDelete