When you vote tomorrow – remember…..
On
19th September 1893, Premier Richard Seddon (King Dick) – who had
challenged women attaining their Suffrage every step of the way - with
consummate impudence, telegraphed Mrs. Kate Sheppard “Electoral Bill assented to by His Excellency the Governor at quarter
to twelve this day and trust now that all doubts as to the sincerity of the
Government in this very important matter has been effectively removed.”
N.Z. taking its medicine |
His
deeper feelings were more probably voiced by the Christchurch Press “We now have got the Female Franchise as
surely as we had the Measles. It has come to stay and we must make the best of
it.”
Winning
the right to vote was a great victory for our country and one that had been
fiercely hard-earned. A huge groundswell of women had met hostility and fury
for years before it was a done deal.
The
issue was forced into prominence by the Women’s
Christian Temperance Union whose motives were feminist. Feminism being the
idea that women should have social, economic and political equality with men
and should have autonomy in determining their lives.
The Temperance Union was
NOT prohibitionist, but had pleaded for moderation in the drinking habits of a rowdy
masculine colony with too many pubs and an overwhelming percentage of males to
females. It had become quickly evident to the Christian women leaders that to
protect women and children, some form of political and legal empowerment for
women was the obvious goal - if one wanted temperance to prevail. As well as
struggling for political rights, the Temperance
Union led women in the latest ideas of child care, nutrition, provision for
ex-prisoners, dress reform and sexual equality in marriage.
National Council of Women |
Temperance
and the Suffrage movement formed a special relationship in New Zealand. Women
played a vital and practical role in pioneer New Zealand.
A spirit of
egalitarianism had early asserted itself in this newly formed country.
The Old
World’s conservative forces hadn’t yet had time to become too strongly
entrenched within our political systems.
The
right to cast a ballot seems today a minor token to grant women. But then it
was a catalyst that bought deep collective fears into the open. It seemed to
represent all the other changes that had been happening throughout the 19th century.
Many
social, legal and economic changes occurred quickly and relatively easily. However,
trying to extend political rights resulted in high emotions and caused great
controversy.
Torch Bearer |
Women’s suffrage became an evangelical cause for its supporters
who made a religion of the vote.
Opponents saw women’s suffrage as anathema and
blackened the names of its leaders.
The family in
particular was the battleground – it was deemed to be a structure that required
the subordination of women. Women should stay in the domestic sphere!
When
Women’s rights have come to stay,
Oh
who will rock the cradle?
When
wives are at the polls all day,
Oh,
who will rock the cradle?
When
Doctor Mamma’s making pills,
When
merchant Mamma’s selling bills,
Of
course, ‘twill cure all women’s ills,
But
who will rock the cradle?
New Zealand Graphic, August 1891.
And
yet when women began voting, it did not mark revolution or a huge change in
voting patterns of the country.
Women’s suffrage was assimilated quickly. We quite
casually came to accept it as a normal working of the electoral system, despite
only four other countries in the world taking it on board before World War One.
Within a decade, it became self-evident to most Kiwis that women should vote as
a matter of course.
6 Dec 1899 Rutland Street Auckland |
In
fact it could be argued that enfranchisement didn’t mark the beginning of
women’s emancipation but its ending. Many women thought that the removal of
former legal and political barriers to women’s freedom would automatically open
to the full acceptance of women as equals in society.
But until the 1970’s the Feminist
Movement made little headway. Women did not enter public life in large numbers
and failed to compete with men in professions, industry or politics. Roles were
strictly upheld along stereotypical gender lines. A woman’s’ place was firmly
believed to be in the kitchen and the bedroom, subservient to men.
Women
remained second-class citizens.
25000 signatures gathered |
Reflecting
upon our right to vote in the General Election tomorrow makes me sad. The women
in the incumbent government seem a toxic bunch when compared to those social
reformers and humanitarians such as Kate
Shepard, Margaret Sievwright,
Lavinia Kelsy, Elizabeth Henderson and numerous others from the 1890’s.
Our
2014 election issues such as children’s poverty and social inequity seem
shockingly similar to the late 19th century’s problems. Above all,
the arrogance of incumbent Team Key– harkens back to the 19th
century upper-class belief that the ruling class had a natural-born right to
rule. Let the masses “eat cake” and be surveilled without their knowledge,
appears to be their attitude. Their
slick and thoroughly anti-democratic actions revealed over the course of this
ongoing dirty politics saga reminds me of the 19th century men who
fought so hard to prevent half of the population in casting a vote.
So
many women – and men – seem oblivious to our herstory of those brave women’s idealistic
struggle to make the world a better place; When you cast your vote tomorrow,
remember those brave Kiwi reformers who believed in the social welfare of the
whole collective.
19
September 1893, when we won the vote, the world celebrated. A woman from Melbourne
cabled “Your long, patient, faithful,
untiring, earnest, zealous effort is finally rewarded, which means so much, not
for you and the women of NZ only, but for women everywhere on the face of the
globe. It will give new hope and life to all women struggling for emancipation,
and give promise of better times, of an approaching millennium for all
down-trodden and enslaved millions of women, not only in so-called Christian
countries, but in India and the harems of the East.
Right glad I am and proud of New
Zealand.”
No comments:
Post a Comment