Eleanor
Catton became New Zealand’s darling when she won the Man Booker prize on this
day October 15th, last year 2013.
The youngest-ever winner with the
longest-ever book, her perceptive and thoughtful insights had us all running to
read her book.
At
the time, she swept to fame with other young luminaries - musician Lorde and
golfing heroine Lydia Ko.
These three women made Kiwis everywhere proud, as
they hit the world with such positive headlines.
A Sleep-In in New York |
Then
in February 2014, the news broke that Hollywood is stepping into Hokitika to
make a TV mini-series of Catton’s book. Eleanor had insisted the production be
filmed on New Zealand’s West Coast where her novel is set. Although all
Hokitka’s historic buildings have gone, the beach, the river and the mountains
remain and we do have an experienced film industry.
Hokitika township in the 1870's |
What
a coup for Catton and Aotearoa. I admire this young woman for swinging this
deal to tell her story in a different medium. Further, in using her
intelligence and power, she provides profit for our local filmmakers. While at
the same time she delivers the greater boon of visualising N.Z’s 19th
century past into life on the silver screen for us all.
I’m
looking forward to hearing Eleanor Catton speak at the beginning of November
when she takes part in The Women’s Bookshop’s Litera-Tea – an afternoon of
womens’ words, wit and wisdom. Visit www.womensbookshop.co.nz for information.
Read on for a review of The Luminaries - The Golden Heart - I wrote
last year. I write from an astrological perspective to counter-balance the
mainstream media reviews. In astrology’s symbolic language the Luminaries are
the Sun and the Moon, for these two bodies in our sky are the light-givers for
us on planet Earth.
The
golden Sun brings daylight and represents consciousness, power, spirit, courage
and heart. The illumination of the night is provided by the silver Moon, which
although constant in its cycle, is inconstant in its waxing and waning light.
The Moon symbolises our feelings and needs that ebb and flow, emanating from
our past and unconsciousness.
In
traditional astrology, the Sun was taken by a patriarchal culture to mean the
masculine and the Moon feminine. Nowadays - Carl Jung’s interpretations notwithstanding
- feminist astrologers aren’t into using stereotypes that masquerade under the
guise of archetypes.
Biology
does not create destiny unless you live in a particularly patriarchal culture
where ones’ role is dictated by what sex you’re born into. The active Sun and
the receptive Moon are freed from their old cultural prison of ‘masculine’ and ‘feminine’.
Their symbolic meanings may dance within both genders.
The astrological Sun
symbolises women’s and men’s outgoing sunny, creative selves. Likewise the
soulful Moon represents our instinctual habits – where and how we feel most at
home.
However,
in Catton’s The Luminaries, the astrology
is traditional. The two characters that represent the luminaries of Sun and
Moon are in the old-fashioned, 19th century sense a man and a woman
- and they become the heart of her story.
A GOLDEN HEART
In which Fern marvels at the literary establishment
that ignores - at their peril - astrological arcana; she attempts digging for
golden nuggets while unravelling the mysteries of the silver threads at the
heart of The Luminaries.
Since
reading Eleanor Catton’s The Luminaries,
I have searched for reviews to supplement my understanding of the book and
found that very few mention astrology, and then only fleetingly. As the very
architecture of the book, not to mention its content, is informed and infused
with astrological wisdom, this seems to show how fundamentally marginalised
astrology is from the mainstream gatekeepers of our cultural practices.
One
particularly obnoxious, New Zealand reviewer states; ‘a five finger exercise webbed together by the dubious dinosaur cement
of astrology’. This quote, despite coming from a nasty, misogynistic review
seems to sum up the overall underlying attitude towards astrology - despite its
importance to The Luminaries - of the
English-speaking world’s top reviewers. (The Guardian, NY Times, Telegraph, The
Listener etc).
(Their reviews of the book itself are much kinder, wiser and more
insightful than our sour-grapes, resident Kiwi.)
And
of course, the Man Booker judges saw fit to give Catton the prize from a field
of first-class world writers. This speaks of the vivid power of her writing,
the intricacy of her plot and the marvellous mis-en-scene she creates in the
Wild West gold digging town of Hokitika during the mid-1860s.
I
found the book hard to put down as it is a lively murder mystery that lured me in
with a cliff-hanger at the end of every chapter. Every sentence led me on, or
doubled me back to fit a puzzle that was challenging to de-code, but fun to
try.
I am not sure if the style of writing that reminds me of Charles Dickens,
was meant to be a parody or a tribute to the great 19th century, Victorian
novels. The compelling setting, the involved descriptions, the multiple
story-lines, the old-time chapter headings, the melodrama, the confessions and
revelations from realistic characters – all of these combine into some classic
confabulation that turns back into itself, ending at its beginning. Extraordinary!
The modern site of Crosbie Well's cottage |
And
then there is the astrology. The first page gives us a Character Chart where
the 20 main characters are identified as signs and planets – and places as
astrological Houses.
The dead man Crosbie
Wells is classified under the Heading of Terra Firma and orbiting around
him are 7 characters who represent the Planets.
There are a further 12 men who
are grouped as Stellar, and who symbolise the zodiac signs as identified in the
astrological charts that Catton provides at the beginning of each Part.
Each chapter within each Part is set on the
day of that chart. Each chapter has a heading that tells of the astrological
influences at work – e.g. Mercury
in Sagittarius
where we are introduced to Walter Moody who in the Character Chart is identified as Mercury and under whose force of Reason
he moves.
Thomas Balfour who also
recounts his story in this chapter, carries the sign of Sagittarius.
The
book is long but has an unusual structure. The first Part has 360 pages! (there
are 360 degrees in a zodiac’s wheel) There are 12 Parts (12 zodiac signs) with each Part having exactly half the word
count of the one that came before it, so the book curls in on itself – a sphere
within a sphere. (referencing the Fibonacci sequence and the Nautilus spiral)
This
is complex, cunning, mind-bending wit, and yet you don’t have to know astrology
to enjoy the experience of reading this intrigue. The astrology enhances the
experience, yet not knowing it obviously doesn’t diminish the engrossing tale,
as most of the reviewers testify.
I
find Catton’s knowledge breath-taking and her structural and writing
achievement marvellous.
I
quibble over her one of her characters using the tarot cards, as they weren’t
part of the English-speaking world’s experience until the very late 19th
century. Yet her overall historical reconstruction is absorbing.
Venus with Crescent Moon |
I do find her
traditional astrology’s patriarchal bias giving form to a cast of all male
characters except for the feminine Moon and Venus, rather disconcerting. Although
I grudgingly acknowledge the overwhelming masculine presence in that neck of
the woods at that historical time, the lack of women from the ‘12 good men and
true’ of the zodiac still jars a feminist perspective.
And indeed Margaret Shepherd - playing Moon to her
husband’s tyrannical Saturn - has a significant role in the plot despite her
absence from the Character Chart. Perhaps she didn’t quite fit Catton’s schema?
(the 13th sign?)
However
I love the author’s unique, thoughtful astrological interpretations. And I love
the very thought of a major book like this, utilising astrology in such an
intellectual, genius way as a poke in the eye to the chattering classes - who
in general despise the very notion of astrology.
Having
poured over Catton’s natal horoscope (Libra Sun with combust conjunct Mercury and
that retrograde Jupiter and Moon in Aquarius are features), I laugh at the reviewers
critiquing her ‘cool’ and ‘detached’ style. I guess it takes all that elemental
airy elegance combined with the sting in the tail of Saturn in Scorpio, to
ruffle the feathers of the establishment.
KirstyGunn in the Guardian states
But it is also a massive shaggy dog story; a great
empty bag; an enormous, wicked, gleeful cheat. For nothing in this enormous
book, with its exotic and varied cast of characters whose lives all affect each
other and whose fates are intricately entwined, amounts to anything like
the moral and emotional weight one would expect of it. That's the point,
in the end, I think, of The
Luminaries. It's not about story at all. It's about what happens to us
when we read novels – what we think we want from them – and from novels of
this size, in particular. Is it worthwhile to spend so much time with a
story that in the end isn't invested in its characters? Or is thinking about
why we should care about them in the first place the really interesting thing?
Making us consider so carefully whether we want a story with emotion and heart
or an intellectual idea about the novel in the disguise of historical fiction…
There lies the real triumph of Catton's remarkable book.
I suspect
Gunn is right in one way - the book is like a shaggy dog story. The whole
shebang revolves around a dead body. Indeed I am still struggling to understand
why Catton designated Terra Firma – our planet Earth – as a dead man.
In
astrology’s metaphysical wisdom, the cosmos with all its planets are alive and
singing. I admit the distillation of astrology’s symbolism into each character
and scene creates a strangely detached puzzle that may appear ultimately to be
without heart – for indeed lying at the centre is a dead man whose heart does
not beat. So on one level the story indeed becomes an enormous wicked gleeful cheat – a great empty bag.
Yet if Terra
Firma is symbolised as a dead body, then this idea does carry a moral and emotional weight. Earth the
dead centre, is exploited and murdered by Venus and Mars; ignored by Jupiter
and Saturn who are engrossed in their own worldly squabbles of ambition and
power.
Maybe the author wants us to resuscitate the dead empty centre -
rethink our attitudes towards our planet? She revives the Romance of the
19th century in style and substance, she re-animates our history,
our quest for gold and greenstone, and reveals Wells’ heart-breaking pleas for
his brother to show some love ( humanity).
She carefully embeds an ancient yet reviled
metaphysical knowledge that is at the heart of most Western cultural traditions,
into the foundations of her book and demands we read the story through its
lens.
Is Catton
intimating that perhaps our modern materialist version of Earth is a dead idea
and needs to be restored? Reclaim the past to better re-view the future?
I don’t
agree with Gunn that the story has no emotion or heart. The love story of the
two Luminaries which ends and begins with the Old Moon in the Young Moon’s arms,
is a heartfelt, even romantic tale that is both old and new - and so worth
reading!
Old Moon in the New Moon's Arms |
THE
LUMINARIES
Eleanor
Catton
Victoria
University Press 2013
I was disappointed when I tried to read The Luminaries. I read over a quarter which I thought was fair but I wasn't enjoying it and found it hard work. Having read your thoughts, Fern, maybe I'll give it another try in a few months time. Thanks for the insights. Jeff
ReplyDelete